Principles of Macroeconomics — your complete study companion
This hub rebuilds the EE212 lecture slides into a teaching format: every key idea is explained in plain language (often beyond the slide), every important formula is boxed, the blanks your professor left are filled in and marked with a green tag, and the hard ideas come with clean graphs. Four units, then fully-worked assignments.
Introduction to Macroeconomics
What economics is · micro vs macro · goals & policies · types of variables · key indicators · schools of thought.
Economics = the science of scarcity and choice
Economics studies how individuals and societies choose to use the scarce resources that nature and previous generations provided. Because resources are limited but wants are unlimited, choice is unavoidable.
The three basic questions every society answers
- What to produce?
- How to produce it?
- For whom — who gets the goods and services?
Micro vs. Macro
Microeconomics zooms in — individual industries, firms and households (one market's price & quantity).
Macroeconomics zooms out — the whole nation's aggregates: total income, employment, output, the price level.
Positive vs. Normative
Positive = facts & cause-effect, no value judgment (“what is”). e.g. “A tax cut raised spending 2%.”
Normative = value judgments (“what should be”). e.g. “The government ought to cut taxes.” Policy debates are normative.
The four goals — and the two big policy levers
Economists judge outcomes against four criteria:
Monetary policy = the Central Bank's tools to control the quantity of money.
Stock vs. Flow, and Nominal vs. Real
Stock vs. Flow
Stock = measured at an instant (a photograph). Flow = measured over a period (a video).
Nominal vs. Real
Nominal = not adjusted for price changes. Real = adjusted for prices (divide out inflation).
The dashboard of the economy
Macro health is read from three groups of indicators:
- Level & growth of output — GDP and its growth rate.
- Internal stability — inflation, unemployment, interest rates, income distribution.
- External stability — balance of payments, international reserves, external debt, exchange rate.
① Output & the business cycle
Aggregate output = total goods & services produced in a period. The business cycle is its short-run ups and downs around a rising long-run trend.
② Prices & inflation
③ Unemployment
Labour-force participation rate = Labour forceWorking-age population × 100
Unemployment rate = UnemployedLabour force × 100 ← the blank: divide by the labour force, not population
Structural — skills/industries no longer match the economy (e.g. automation).
Cyclical — caused by recessions (demand falls).
④ Interest rates
Creditors (lenders/savers) want the real rate high; debtors (borrowers) want it low. Loan rate > deposit rate — the spread is the bank's margin.
⑤ Income distribution — Lorenz curve & Gini
From Classical to Keynesian — the big argument that runs through this course
Keynesian = the short run: prices & wages are sticky, economy can sit below full employment — so policy has room to work.
Keynes: “In the long run we are all dead.”
National Income & Product Accounts (GDP)
Circular flow · what GDP is · GDP vs GNP · the three ways to measure it · nominal vs real & the deflator · limitations.
Five sectors, one loop of money
Macro tracks five groups: (1) Households + (2) Firms = the private sector, (3) Government, (4) Rest of the world, and (5) Financial institutions.
The circular flow shows income and payments moving between them. Two forces act on the loop:
Gross Domestic Product — read the definition word-by-word
Where vs. Whose
GDP — output produced inside the country (any owner).
GNP — output produced by a country's citizens/factors (anywhere in the world).
The correction term is called Net Factor Income from Abroad (NFIEA).
Same number, three doors — they must all agree
(a) Production (value-added) approach
Sum the value added at every stage. Worked from the slide (orange-juice example):
| Stage | Sales value | Value added |
|---|---|---|
| Oranges (farm) | 500 | 500 |
| Orange juice | 650 | 150 |
| Juice bottled (factory) | 900 | 250 |
| Retail sale (supermarket) | 1,200 | 300 |
| Total value added | — | 1,200 |
(b) Expenditure approach — the one you'll use most
Change in inventories = end − beginning = 3 − 2 = 1 unit = 10 ฿. This counts as investment even though it wasn't sold — it was produced this year.
GDP = final sales + change in inventories + other components.
NDP = GDP − Depreciation. So NDP = C + (I − Depreciation) + G + (X − M).
(c) Income approach
Factor incomes = compensation of employees + proprietors' income + corporate profits + net interest + rental income.
And disposable income splits: DI = C + S (if no personal interest/transfer payments).
Separating "more stuff" from "higher prices"
Real GDP = Σ (Pbase year × Qcurrent) — holds prices fixed at the base year
→ Full numeric solution (base year = Year 3) is in Worked Example A2.
GDP is not the same as well-being
National Income & Equilibrium Determination
The Keynesian core: consumption & saving · investment · the DAE line · equilibrium (two methods) · the multiplier · paradox of thrift · GDP gaps.
Desired vs. Actual — the engine of Keynesian economics
Keynes built the model on desired (planned) spending, not actual spending. The gap between them is unplanned inventory, and it's what pushes the economy toward equilibrium.
DAE (Desired Aggregate Expenditure) = Desired C + Desired I + G + (X − M)
The consumption function C = Ca + bYd
Keynes: the main driver of consumption is disposable income Yd = Y − T. Using the slide's numbers, C = 100 + 0.6Yd.
b = MPC = ΔCΔYd = slope = 0.6 → of each extra ฿, 60 satang is spent
APC = CYd (average) MPC = marginal (the slope)
Saving is just the mirror image
S = −100 + 0.4Yd → intercept −Ca, slope = MPS = 0.4
Life-Cycle (Ando & Modigliani): people smooth consumption over a lifetime — borrow when young, save in middle age, dissave in retirement.
Investment, Government & Net exports
Investment I
Driven by the real interest rate (↑r → ↓I) and income (↑Y → ↑I), plus technology, existing capital, taxes, expectations.
Induced: I = Ia + dY
Accelerator principle: investment demand is derived from the change in output — a rising ΔY accelerates net investment.
Government G & Net exports (X−M)
G is set by policy, planned in advance → treated as autonomous (G = Ga, flat line vs. Y). Expansionary policy shifts it up; contractionary shifts it down.
Exports X depend on foreign demand → autonomous (X = Xa).
m = MPM = ΔMΔY
Add it all up
= (Ca − bTa + Ia + Ga + Xa − Ma) + (b + d − m)Y
↑ autonomous part (the intercept) ↑ slope of the DAE line
Y = DAE (the "Keynesian cross")
Equilibrium = no tendency to change. In the goods market that means output equals desired spending:
Closed, with gov: YE = 11 − b(Ca − bTa + Ia + Ga)
Open, with gov: YE = 11 − b + m(Ca − bTa + Ia + Ga + Xa − Ma)
Injection = Leakage (must give the same YE)
At equilibrium the money added to the loop equals the money drained from it:
Closed, with gov: I + G = S + T
Open, with gov: I + G + X = S + T + M
→ Both methods solved on the same numbers in A3 & A4 — and they agree (YE = 880).
Why a small push moves income a lot
Spend 1,000฿ building a factory. The builders earn 1,000฿; they spend MPC of it (600฿); those receivers spend 600×0.6 = 360฿; and so on — an infinite but shrinking chain:
More leakages → smaller multiplier. Adding an income tax and imports changes the denominator to (1 − slope of DAE). Higher MPC (or lower MPS) → bigger multiplier.
Balanced-budget multiplier = 1: raise G and T by the same amount and Y rises by exactly that amount.
If everyone saves more, everyone earns less
An individual saving more is prudent. But if everyone tries to save more at once, aggregate demand falls → firms cut output → income falls → and society may end up saving the same (or less). This is a fallacy of composition: what's true for one isn't true for all.
Inflationary vs. Deflationary gap
Compare equilibrium output YE with full-employment (potential) output YF.
Classical: at full employment, prices flexible → DAE↑ mostly raises P, not Y → smallest multiplier.
Non-Keynes non-classic: below full employment but prices do move → in between.
So ΔY: Keynes > in-between > Classical.
Fiscal Policy
Government spending & taxing · tools · tax structures · public debt · budget types · automatic vs discretionary · policy problems.
Fiscal policy = the government's spending & taxing choices
Its objectives mirror the four macro goals: efficient allocation, fair distribution, growth, and stability. Four tools:
Indirect — the payer can shift it onto others (VAT/sales tax, excise, customs duties).
Progressive · Proportional · Regressive
Compare the average tax rate (T/Y) and marginal tax rate (ΔT/ΔY) as income rises. Same three income bands (each 1,000 wide) in every table.
① Progressive — rate rises with income
| Income band | Rate | Cumulative Y | Tax paid T | Avg rate T/Y | Marginal ΔT/ΔY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–1,000 | 10% | 1,000 | 100 | 0.100 | 0.10 |
| 1,001–2,000 | 12% | 2,000 | 220 | 0.110 | 0.12 |
| 2,001–3,000 | 15% | 3,000 | 370 | 0.123 | 0.15 |
T at 2,000 = 100 + (1,000×0.12) = 220; T at 3,000 = 220 + (1,000×0.15) = 370.
② Proportional (constant)
| Y | T (10%) | T/Y | ΔT/ΔY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | 100 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 2,000 | 200 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 3,000 | 300 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
③ Regressive — rate falls with income
| Y | T | T/Y | ΔT/ΔY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | 150 (15%) | 0.150 | 0.15 |
| 2,000 | 270 (12%) | 0.135 | 0.12 |
| 3,000 | 370 (10%) | 0.123 | 0.10 |
Borrowing and the budget balance
Public debt is classified by term (short < 1 yr, long > 5 yr) and source (domestic vs. international). It affects price stability, resource allocation, income distribution, and the state's ability to run projects.
In accounting terms total spending is financed by revenue + public debt + treasury reserves.
Automatic vs. discretionary — and expansion vs. contraction
Tools: income tax (T = Ta + tY) and transfer payments (R = Ra − gY).
Inflation / inflationary gap → Contractionary: ↓G, ↑T → DAE↓ → Y↓.
Six real-world problems
- Lags — recognition → decision → execution → response. By the time it acts, the problem may have changed.
- Irreversibility — programmes are hard to switch off once the crisis passes.
- Expectations — if people think a stimulus is temporary, they don't change behaviour.
- Political goals can conflict with economic stability (spending before elections).
- Extra saving — an expansion fails to stimulate if households just save the extra income (paradox of thrift again).
- Crowding-out — government borrowing pushes up interest rates and displaces private investment.
Worked Examples (Assignments, fully solved)
Every step shown, so you can reproduce these under exam conditions. Numbers taken from your assignment sheets.
Nominal & Real GDP, deflator, inflation — base year = Year 3
Three goods: Books (B), Rulers (R), Erasers (E).
| Year | PB | QB | PR | QR | PE | QE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 80 | 20 | 300 | 5 | 250 |
| 2 | 120 | 60 | 30 | 250 | 6 | 150 |
| 3 (base) | 130 | 90 | 35 | 400 | 7 | 450 |
Nominal GDP = Σ (current P × current Q)
- Year 1 = 100·80 + 20·300 + 5·250 = 8,000 + 6,000 + 1,250 = 15,250
- Year 2 = 120·60 + 30·250 + 6·150 = 7,200 + 7,500 + 900 = 15,600
- Year 3 = 130·90 + 35·400 + 7·450 = 11,700 + 14,000 + 3,150 = 28,850
Real GDP = Σ (Year-3 P × current Q) — prices fixed at 130 / 35 / 7
- Year 1 = 130·80 + 35·300 + 7·250 = 10,400 + 10,500 + 1,750 = 22,650
- Year 2 = 130·60 + 35·250 + 7·150 = 7,800 + 8,750 + 1,050 = 17,600
- Year 3 = 130·90 + 35·400 + 7·450 = 28,850 (= nominal, because Year 3 is the base year ✓)
GDP deflator = (Nominal ÷ Real) × 100
- Year 1 = 15,250 / 22,650 × 100 = 67.33
- Year 2 = 15,600 / 17,600 × 100 = 88.64
- Year 3 = 28,850 / 28,850 × 100 = 100.00
Growth rates
- Nominal growth Y2 = (15,600−15,250)/15,250 = +2.30%
- Nominal growth Y3 = (28,850−15,600)/15,600 = +84.94%
- Real growth Y2 = (17,600−22,650)/22,650 = −22.30%
- Real growth Y3 = (28,850−17,600)/17,600 = +63.92%
Inflation (from the deflator)
- Year 2 = (88.64−67.33)/67.33 = +31.65%
- Year 3 = (100−88.64)/88.64 = +12.82%
Open economy with government — every step
Given: C = 80 + 0.4Yd, I = 50 + 0.6Y, G = 30, T = 10 + 0.1Y, X = 40, M = 20 + 0.16Y, with Yd = Y − T.
Step 1 — substitute to get C in terms of Y
C = 80 + 0.4(−10 + 0.9Y) = 80 − 4 + 0.36Y = 76 + 0.36Y
Step 2 — build DAE
= (76 + 0.36Y) + (50 + 0.6Y) + 30 + 40 − (20 + 0.16Y)
= (76+50+30+40−20) + (0.36+0.6−0.16)Y = 176 + 0.80Y
Step 3 — set Y = DAE (Question 1)
Question 3 — multipliers (the important, subtle part)
The DAE slope is k = b(1−t) + d − m = 0.4(0.9) + 0.6 − 0.16 = 0.80, so the common multiplier is:
| Autonomous variable | Multiplier (∂Y/∂·) |
|---|---|
| Ca, Ia, Ga, Xa (spending) | +5 |
| Ma (imports — a leakage) | −5 |
| Ta (autonomous tax) = −b/(1−k) | −0.4/0.2 = −2 |
Meaning: +1 unit of autonomous G raises equilibrium income by 5 units; +1 unit of autonomous tax lowers it by 2 units.
Question 4 — ΔGa = +4 and ΔTa = +20
New YE = 880 − 20 = 860
Check by re-deriving: new G=34, T=30+0.1Y → C=68+0.36Y → DAE=172+0.8Y → YE=172/0.2=860 ✓
Question 5 — if current income is 700 (below YE)
At Y = 700, DAE = 176 + 0.8(700) = 736 > 700. Desired spending exceeds output → inventories fall unexpectedly → firms raise production → income rises. The process continues until Y = 880, the equilibrium.
Same economy, second method — should give YE = 880 again
Step 1 — saving function
with Yd = −10 + 0.9Y → S = −80 + 0.6(−10 + 0.9Y) = −86 + 0.54Y
Step 2 — set Injection = Leakage (Question 1)
Leakage: S + T + M = (−86 + 0.54Y) + (10 + 0.1Y) + (20 + 0.16Y) = −56 + 0.8Y
120 + 0.6Y = −56 + 0.8Y → 176 = 0.2Y → YE = 880 ✓ (matches Method 1)
Question 4 — autonomous saving rises 7 units (Paradox of Thrift)
More autonomous saving = less autonomous consumption (Ca effectively ↓7). Saving is a leakage, so with multiplier 5:
Question 5 — if current income is 950 (above YE)
At Y = 950, leakage (−56 + 0.8·950 = 704) > injection (120 + 0.6·950 = 690). Output exceeds desired spending → goods pile up as unplanned inventory → firms cut production → income falls until Y = 880.
Formula Cheat-Sheet
National accounts
Deflator = (Nominal ÷ Real) × 100
GNP = GDP + NFIEA
NNP = GNP − Depreciation
DI = C + S
Consumption & saving
MPC + MPS = 1
Break-even: C = Yd (S = 0)
Equilibrium (open, with gov)
or solve Y = DAE directly (safest)
Multipliers
Tax = −b1 − b ; Balanced-budget = 1
Rates
Unemployment = (Unemployed ÷ Labour force) × 100
Gini = A ÷ (A + B)
No topics match your search. Try a shorter word (e.g. “multiplier”, “Gini”, “deflator”).